ARE POLTERGEIST PESTICIDES STEALING YOUR VITAMIN D?

This is a horror movie: People whose bodies are haunted by a higher quantity of certain ancient, antique pesticides are likely to have lower levels of Vitamin D in their bodies. How those pesticides persist is one question; how they interact with Vitamin D is another.

This correlation was found in seals recently: The more old pesticide they had stored in their blubber, the lower their D levels. Uh oh. Low Vitamin D itself correlates with various nasty stuff like cancer, infections, and diabetes — in humans. Maybe seals, too.

So these folks checked out the human situation.

Back to the first question: Organochlorine pesticides are best represented by dear, old DDT. Banned long ago in this great nation, DDT is so resistant* to breaking down that it, and its chemical descendants*, continues to circulate in living things. Because it accumulates in fat, it is stored securely in bodies that consume it. Seals, who eat a billion oily fish, end up with all the DDT (and other organochlorines and persistent* organic pollutants [POPs]). Polar bears, and we, at the top of the food chain, are the ultimate consumers of POPs.

So that’s how the chemicals are still around, and still in everybody’s body.

How do they interact with Vitamin D? Good freakin’ question.

And what to do about it? Eat more Vitamin D? Who knows.

To date, the most efficient way to dump your body burden of POPs is — wait, there are two ways:

1: Be eaten by a polar bear, who will absorb all your POPs.

2: Breast feed a baby. This is challenging for men, but see “polar bears,” above. For females, nursing cycles so much fat, and the POPs clinging to it, into her infant that her own body burden is reduced by 69 percent!

*It is a goldarn miracle that anybody ever masters this language of ours. Why on EARTH does one of these words end “ent” and the other “ant”? Is there a rule for this? Did I miss that day in high school English?

Art: Cool painting, eh? Craftily the artist forces your eyes to sweep between the two points of high contrast — the dogs — in which process you stumble across the wraith.

Repost This
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE HIGH HEALTH COST OF HIGH GRADES

Perhaps I’m late to this realization: If striving for high grades stresses a kid out, why would anybody push that kid to get high grades? This occurs to me now because school-stressed Chinese kids were most likely to get PTSD after the 2008 earthquake.

Jeeeee-zuss!

Recap: In 2008 the Wenchuan earthquake smacked the crap out of south central China. A bunch of schools collapsed. Upward of 69,000 people died, and hundreds of thousands were injured. It was traumatic.

Now researchers have used that trauma to investigate the “who’s” and “why’s” of PTSD. Studying adolescents, they characterized the psyhcological burden each kid was carrying:

• Directly impacted by death or loss of house, etc., in the quake

• Post-quake trauma, punishment, illness, conflict, school pressure.

• Coping style — naturally retreats in hard times, or naturally seeks solutions

By 97 points on the Richter Scale, school pressure was the strongest predictor of which kids ended up with PTSD.

SCHOOL IS SO BAD FOR YOU!

There are, to be fair to school, there 99 potential problems with this study.

Prior research says that a naturally active amygdala — which is also active in anxious people — is a damn good predictor of who gets PTSD. So it could be that the same kids who are vulnerable to quake PTSD are also vulnerable to school pressure — that this is a mere correlation.

SCHOOL MAY ONLY BE BAD FOR ANXIOUS PEOPLE!

Another potential confound is that the scientists asked kids to recall the events in their lives, and human memory is notoriously full of crap.

Anyway, China is the right place to study this: Getting good grades early on sets a kid up for future educational opportunities. So academic pressure sets in early and hard in that culture.

But speaking purely anecdotally, based on convos with a number of educator pals, the same pattern is on the rise in the U.S. culture. Starting in high school, kids are pushed and prodded to do more, do better, reach for higher level courses, and start a small nonprofit providing clean water to all the people of Panama, so that they can get into a prestigious college. Where — and this is not anecdotal — a record number of them are suffering anxiety problems, in part because they don’t belong there. They were boosted, shoved, leg-upped, shot-putted, and application-tutored into schools more demanding than they could handle.

Whereupon they encountered their natural fear of heights. They’ve been told for so long that they’re special that most of them (three-quarters) believe they’re above average. This implies either a poor national grasp of math, or of reality. The fact that these kids hit a brick wall of stress when they hit college suggests it’s a realistic self-image that has eluded them.

Anyway, interesting insight into the pressures that come to bear on the human head: Rigorous schooling ain’t always good for your character, apparently — not always the best path to your child’s future.

Unless you want your kid’s future to be spent on anti-anxiety drugs.

Watching my own head, here: Knowing what I know of my culture, I bet most people would still want their kid to get into Harvard even if they knew it could stress the kid into an anxiety disorder. I mean, there’s a pill for that, right? There’s no Harvard pill.

Repost This
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MAGIC MUSHROOMS MAY TURN OFF THE BRAIN’S “ME” CIRCUIT

Following a Pilgrimish ban on psychedelic drugs, science is now resurrecting them for research. Various hallucinogens are shown to stimulate profound spiritual growth, and fight depression. How? Perhaps by sidelining a brain’s preoccupation with Self.

These researchers shot volunteers up with the active ingredient in Psilocybe mushrooms, and MRI-ed them as they hallucinated. (They used seasoned veterans of this form of travel, to avoid a newbie going bonkers in the loud, small MRI tube.)

Most notable to the scientists was a disruption of a circuit of activity between brain regions. This particular circuit, linking a few different “hubs,” has been proposed as the origin of our self awareness: Somehow, feedback and eavesdropping amongst these regions may produce a “self” on which we can reflect.

And under the influence of ‘shrooms, that circuitry stifled itself. The quieter the wires went, the more intense hallucinations the tripper experienced. The technical description of this is: a state of unconstrained cognition.

Unconstrained cognition. Pilgrims aren’t into that.

Art: Study up before you chow down.

Repost This
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

KNOW YOUR NARCISSIST: MALES ARE MORE STRESSED

Narcissist: Oh, you know them when you see them. They strive to acquire people, pets, and places that make them look interesting. But if anything threatens to make them look bad — or even normal — stand back. The best defense of their delusions is a good offense.

This study looked at how that response — a narcissist’s daily defense of his illusions of greatness — effects the body. It kinda hints that being a narcissistic man could cause excessive wear and tear.

Interestingly, the researchers split subjects into people with “healthy” and “unhealthy” narcissism.

Healthy: Self-confident, may enjoy leadership, connects emotionally with others.

Unhealthy: Entitled, exploitative, pursues power with abandon, shifting interests, socially adept but superficial.

“Bad” narcissism is believed to result in part from a childhood where love had to be earned the old-fashioned way: by making a parent look good. A kid lacking a naturally resilient personality is at risk to grow up believing they’re only as good as the people, places and things they can catch and stick to themselves like Girl Scout badges. In that sense, one narcissist can beget another, for generations. Also in that sense, they are like decorator crabs, who stick sea life to their own carapace. Or like caddis fly larvae in their tubes of detritus. Or a dog in the manger.

And woe betide the person who peers too closely at one of those merit badges. To a narcissist, that’s life-threatening. They don’t respond very well to therapy, because they defend their illusory armor with a fury that leads to a game called “musical therapists.” Musical everything, really, since any conflict results in a spirited round of the blame game:

It’s not my fault! You set me up! I deserve better!

Am I belaboring the point?

Anyway, it was only the unhealthy version that correlated with an elevated level of circulating cortisol. Cortisol is a stress indicator, and it’s not the greatest chemical to have coursing through your body. People who stress out too much suffer repercussions of the heart and immune system. Cortisol is a bit like battery acid.

The study found that men with unhealthy narcissism, but not their female counterparts,had unusual cortisol levels. Their levels seemed to run high. Defending those merit badges all day long seemed to wind them right up.

Females, however, didn’t show that effect.

No idea why. Hormones, presumably — chemistry and complicated things. Maybe Dr. Linz has a hypothesis.

Tomorrow: Tulipism. Or maybe Crysanthemism.

Repost This
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

FAT HEADED MEN ARE MEANER, AND WE CAN SEE IT IN THEIR FACE

“Meaner” may be an exaggeration, since aggression isn’t always bad natured. But some research is finding that a wide face correlates with aggressive behavior, including more minutes in the hockey penalty box. And we can judge this in a glance.

Background: In puberty, the skull shape of boys and girls diverges. Females progress to a normal, lovely skull. Males go wide. And males with the highest levels of testosterone circulating in their blood at puberty go widest. Ergo, a fat head appears to be a “true signal” of hormonal hyper-maleness.

Studies have linked this lug-headed skull shape to more aggressive play in computer games and hockey. So a fat head appears to be a “true signal” of an aggressive personality.

Now, since we’re a social species, wading through a sea of other humans, doing our damndest to come out on top, or at least alive, we have evolved to gauge each others’ character from a distance, thus to avoid getting dangerously close to the meanies.

So this study asked if people would rate photos of men and women as “aggressive” based merely on the width of their skull.

Yeppers. Well, yes for males. We seem to be hardwired to armor up when we see a fat-faced guy.

But is this a “cultural artifact”? Maybe we just expect meatheads to act meatheaded because our culture has settled on that stereotype.

So the team tested that effect: “Which faces look most nurturing,” they asked about the same group of portraits. And cultural stereotypes (females are more nurturing) didn’t appear to be involved.

Small study, squishy area of research, but interesting.

Repost This
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment